Talk:Polyphemus: Difference between revisions
Planterror (talk | contribs) →Carrier Flagship and this map: new section |
m After deeper testing on maps where Flagship's main attack sees constant usage and on Polyphemus specifically, a 15% difference is not "marginal", it is significant. |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Hey @[[User:Player|Player]] are you confident that 5-0-2 flagship is the better crosspath in this scenario, despite the eye providing camo detection and attack speed? I would think the Hot Shots are better in this specific case, especially considering they recently buffed it's damage over time to scale with the tier of the boat. [[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 14:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | Hey @[[User:Player|Player]] are you confident that 5-0-2 flagship is the better crosspath in this scenario, despite the eye providing camo detection and attack speed? I would think the Hot Shots are better in this specific case, especially considering they recently buffed it's damage over time to scale with the tier of the boat. [[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 14:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
Before v45.0, Crow's Nest used to give a massive +7 pierce, making Flagship with the 5-0-2 crosspath far, far better in every single case. They fixed the bug this update, and now the 5-0-2 and 5-2-0 each have separate niches. 5-2-0 bests the 5-0-2 crosspath on Polyphemus and other maps where the main attack is taken good advantage of, though 5-0-2 is still slightly better on maps where the main attack does not do much because of Long Range's pierce increase. I changed the recommendation. [[User:Player|Player]] ([[User talk:Player|talk]]) 20:38, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||