Stats talk:Ninja Monkey (BTD6): Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 18 February 2025 by Planterror
→Stat mistake: new section |
Planterror (talk | contribs) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It actually isn't a mistake, this was recently added. If the camo isn't stripped such as with Phayze, then counter espionage does deal bonus camo damage. We have verified this in the game files. | |||
--[[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 12:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Stat mistake == | == Stat mistake == | ||
Hi, this is my first time doing this so this talk page might not be the most fitting, but I noticed that this page says that some paths do +2 damage to camos (namely 032 I think), which is wrong (I tested as well just in case). [[User:Miukmiuk|Miukmiuk]] ([[User talk:Miukmiuk|talk]]) 11:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC) | Hi, this is my first time doing this so this talk page might not be the most fitting, but I noticed that this page says that some paths do +2 damage to camos (namely 032 I think), which is wrong (I tested as well just in case). [[User:Miukmiuk|Miukmiuk]] ([[User talk:Miukmiuk|talk]]) 11:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:34, 18 February 2025
It actually isn't a mistake, this was recently added. If the camo isn't stripped such as with Phayze, then counter espionage does deal bonus camo damage. We have verified this in the game files. --Planterror (talk) 12:34, 18 February 2025 (UTC)
Stat mistake
Hi, this is my first time doing this so this talk page might not be the most fitting, but I noticed that this page says that some paths do +2 damage to camos (namely 032 I think), which is wrong (I tested as well just in case). Miukmiuk (talk) 11:01, 18 February 2025 (UTC)