User talk:BloonDom: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 26 May 2025 by DesArch in topic Ongoing
Planterror (talk | contribs) whoops |
→TCRF defunct edit: Reply |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Whether you believe that or not is up to you I guess, but I think it's too early to call this as defunct. Thoughts? | Whether you believe that or not is up to you I guess, but I think it's too early to call this as defunct. Thoughts? | ||
--[[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 02:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC) | --[[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 02:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I think we should redact that edit on TCRF as well. We should not call death on the slightest slipup from NK, when in the past, online functionality for BSM2 and BMCF have gone down before but were quickly fixed. [[User:DesArch|DesArch]] ([[User talk:DesArch|talk]]) 02:34, 26 May 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Closed== | ==Closed== | ||
<!--(Place nothing here, I handle this)--> | <!--(Place nothing here, I handle this)--> | ||
Revision as of 02:34, 26 May 2025
Welcome to my talk page.
Ongoing
TCRF defunct edit
Hey, I've noticed that you have edited the TCRF page for BMC Flash, and claim that it's fully defunct. However, there are many people who have emailed NK support and they have assured the community that it is not intentional and they are looking to fix it. It's been a week since the servers got closed, but even more recent contact has been the same messaging.
Whether you believe that or not is up to you I guess, but I think it's too early to call this as defunct. Thoughts? --Planterror (talk) 02:28, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
- I think we should redact that edit on TCRF as well. We should not call death on the slightest slipup from NK, when in the past, online functionality for BSM2 and BMCF have gone down before but were quickly fixed. DesArch (talk) 02:34, 26 May 2025 (UTC)