Blooncyclopedia talk:About: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Hubianzhen (talk | contribs) →Also built from scratch: Reply |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Ah, people like me were incorrectly saying "built from the ground up". But how do we specify that we built the wiki with only original content and that we've basically got a fresh new beginning? [[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]]) 01:16, 16 January 2026 (UTC) | :::Ah, people like me were incorrectly saying "built from the ground up". But how do we specify that we built the wiki with only original content and that we've basically got a fresh new beginning? [[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]]) 01:16, 16 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
::::If we were to add 'nother bullet point, <code>Welcome to Blooncyclopedia! The free, self-hosted, community-run, publicly accessible and editable Bloons knowledge base that anyone can contribute to.</code> would have to change to fit it. Other than that, I think it's rather obvious we made everything again if you compare literally any page with Fandom. [[User:Lilysse|Lilysse]] ([[User talk:Lilysse|talk]]) 01:53, 16 January 2026 (UTC) | ::::If we were to add 'nother bullet point, <code>Welcome to Blooncyclopedia! The free, self-hosted, community-run, publicly accessible and editable Bloons knowledge base that anyone can contribute to.</code> would have to change to fit it. Other than that, I think it's rather obvious we made everything again if you compare literally any page with Fandom. [[User:Lilysse|Lilysse]] ([[User talk:Lilysse|talk]]) 01:53, 16 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
::::Were you trying to say Blooncyclopedia holds high standards in representing gameplay information accurately and has a more practiced approach to writing content? [[User:Hubianzhen|Hubianzhen]] ([[User talk:Hubianzhen|talk]]) 01:59, 16 January 2026 (UTC) | |||