Blooncyclopedia talk:Strategy guidelines

Blunt descriptions

I'm wondering if the "'useless' towers can be bluntly described" thing should be dialed back. Just saying a tower is "useless" or "should never be used" not only feels elitist, it's unhelpful to anyone outside the writer. It doesn't specify whether the tower is too situational, has a better alternative, is too expensive to be feasibly used, etc. I'm also thinking about balance changes, and specifying what the problems with a tower are can help with re-evaluating it if it gets changed. This edit is an example of how I think it should be handled. Scrooge200 (talk) 23:52, 3 October 2024 (UTC)