Talk:Ascended Shadow: Difference between revisions
Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) →Ascended Shadow camo buff to Paragons: new section |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Is it actually true that Paragons that receive Ascended Shadow's camo buff (tackagon, bombagon) '''actually''' get permauptime against Phayze? I've been getting this rumor claiming that it indeed is full uptime despite other towers getting half uptime, which is simply confusing to me as to whether the permauptime on Paragons with the Camo buff is actually true or not. I mean, Lych has no trouble eating up a Paragon targeted buff, so surely it's not the same anti-exception as the Ascended Shadow? [[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]]) 23:51, 20 October 2025 (UTC) | Is it actually true that Paragons that receive Ascended Shadow's camo buff (tackagon, bombagon) '''actually''' get permauptime against Phayze? I've been getting this rumor claiming that it indeed is full uptime despite other towers getting half uptime, which is simply confusing to me as to whether the permauptime on Paragons with the Camo buff is actually true or not. I mean, Lych has no trouble eating up a Paragon targeted buff, so surely it's not the same anti-exception as the Ascended Shadow? [[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]]) 23:51, 20 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
:From my tests, it seems paragons have 100% camo uptime with the Ascended Shadow camo buff. The "radar jammed" icon (the glitchy camo green) doesn't even appear above the camoless paragons, but they still deal damage to phayze. | |||
:TLDR: seems to be true, paragons have permauptime against phayze. [[User:Whacka|Whacka]] ([[User talk:Whacka|talk]]) 16:44, 15 March 2026 (UTC) | |||