Spiked Balls (BTD6): Difference between revisions

Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs)
Strategy: icicles is a better example; yes, it costs very similar to a spalls btw if you crosspath them, and is the meta choice of ice cleanup even in late-game, yes, even late-game you wanna use it over the cryo which is cheaper. Not sure if the proj maths per spall is worth it on its own, but sure. Sorry for length, but it made more sense with the new structure without fragmenting the sentence structure. Unified the flow I guess?
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
==Strategy==
==Strategy==
{{BTD6 last updated|52.2|section=y}}
{{BTD6 last updated|52.2|section=y}}
Spiked Balls relies too heavily on its Ceramic bonuses to be an efficient cleanup during mid and late game, while lacking enough pierce to compete against supports that have similar costs, such as [[Juggernaut (BTD6)|Juggernaut]], [[Icicles (BTD6)|Icicles]], and [[Bloon Impact (BTD6)|Bloon Impact]]. It's powerful with Berserker Brew, but still requires too much investment to be a reasonable mid-game carry or tanking multiple Super Ceramics. Before round 81, much of its pierce is used on non-Ceramics, and it's less cost-efficient than a base Spike Factory with {{BTD6|Berserker Brew}}. Starting from round 81, it falls off against anything but stray Super Ceramics, since each Super Ceramic requires 1.5 piles to pop each one (0.85 with Berserker Brew). Therefore, Spiked Balls is preferred only as a transition to {{BTD6|Spiked Mines}}, which is its mid-game carry.  
Spiked Balls is an expensive upgrade that lacks the pierce to justify it in the mid game, and in the late game it is less effective against {{BTD6|Super Ceramic}}s than supports of similar prices (e.g. [[Juggernaut (BTD6)|Juggernaut]], [[Icicles (BTD6)|Icicles]], and [[Bloon Impact (BTD6)|Bloon Impact]]). Spiked Balls is only serviceable as a transition to {{BTD6|Spiked Mines}}, which is the mid game carry instead.


Both crosspaths have their own use cases. 3-2-0 is better on shorter maps and when covering only one lane, while 3-0-2 is more useful for defending multiple or intersecting exits.
3-2-0 is better on shorter maps and when covering only one lane, while 3-0-2 is more useful for defending multiple or intersecting exits.


==Update history==
==Update history==