Fortified Bloon (Battles 2): Difference between revisions

Line 19:

{{Strategy needed|State the use cases of when to use Fortified vs non-Fortified, state the viability of hybrid modifiers, and more (also what about jericho)}}

Fortified properties have a similar or greater HP-to-cost ratio to their non-Fortified counterparts, making that extra HP worth it for getting through a defense that lacks single-target damage. It's more notable on MOAB-class rushes, but can still be used with success on Leads and Ceramics. As a general rule of thumb, a Fortified blimp is more cost-effective than two non-Fortified blimps, except versus blimp instakillers (e.g. [[Monkey Pirates (Battles 2)|Monkey Pirates]]) and towers that excel against single-target (e.g. [[First Strike Capability (Battles 2)|First Strike Capability]]), and for tight rushes, which generally prefer spamming the rush for maximum pierce problems.

Fortified properties have a similar or greater HP-to-cost ratio to their non-Fortified counterparts, making that extra HP worth it for getting through a defense that lacks single-target damage. It's more notable on MOAB-class rushes, but can still be used with success on Leads and Ceramics. As a general rule of thumb, a Fortified blimp is more cost-effective than two non-Fortified blimps, except versus blimp instakillers (e.g. [[Monkey Pirates (Battles 2)|Monkey Pirates]]) and towers that excel against single-target (e.g. [[First Strike Capability (Battles 2)|First Strike Capability]]), and for tight rushes, which generally prefer spamming the rush for maximum pierce problems, except if it's Fortified DDTs.

For Ceramic rushes, it's effective for sneaking through round 18-19 rushes that focus too much on beating the early MOABs.

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 {{Strategy needed|State the use cases of when to use Fortified vs non-Fortified, state the viability of hybrid modifiers, and more (also what about jericho)}}
 {{BTDB2 last updated|4.9|section=y}}
-Fortified properties have a similar<!--leads--> or greater HP-to-cost ratio to their non-Fortified counterparts, making that extra HP worth it for getting through a defense that lacks single-target damage. It's more notable on MOAB-class rushes, but can still be used with success on Leads and Ceramics. As a general rule of thumb, a Fortified blimp is more cost-effective than two non-Fortified blimps, except versus blimp instakillers (e.g. [[Monkey Pirates (Battles 2)|Monkey Pirates]]) and towers that excel against single-target (e.g. [[First Strike Capability (Battles 2)|First Strike Capability]]),<!--sending zomgs to shove is a mistake, even if two normal zomgs--> and for tight rushes, which generally prefer spamming the rush for maximum pierce problems.
+Fortified properties have a similar<!--leads--> or greater HP-to-cost ratio to their non-Fortified counterparts, making that extra HP worth it for getting through a defense that lacks single-target damage. It's more notable on MOAB-class rushes, but can still be used with success on Leads and Ceramics. As a general rule of thumb, a Fortified blimp is more cost-effective than two non-Fortified blimps, except versus blimp instakillers (e.g. [[Monkey Pirates (Battles 2)|Monkey Pirates]]) and towers that excel against single-target (e.g. [[First Strike Capability (Battles 2)|First Strike Capability]]),<!--sending zomgs to shove is a mistake, even if two normal zomgs--> and for tight rushes, which generally prefer spamming the rush for maximum pierce problems, except if it's Fortified DDTs.
 For Ceramic rushes, it's effective for sneaking through round 18-19 rushes that focus too much on beating the early MOABs.