Talk:Damage type

Hey folks, I have a brilliant idea.

Why don't we also say which towers have those damage types, instead of just showing what bloons they can pop. That way you can see exactly which tower and path does which damage types without having to go to their individual pages.

- IsaacBoi123 (talk) 22:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Sure, we can totally list every upgrade and crosspath under each damage type instead of just leaving the table that already works perfectly fine. Thank you for this brilliant suggestion. Pixelentropy (talk) 22:55, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

No not each individual crosspath, just which towers do that damage type. (I KNOW IT'S brilliant right?)

IsaacBoi123 (talk) 23:05, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

They are being sarcastic. This table would bloat the hell out of this page and you can already check the damage types on each upgrade's page. Planterror (talk) 23:23, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

But that's what I'm saying! Why do I have to go to every individual upgrade page JUST to see their damage types? It's tedious and annoying if I'm just looking for a quick list. It doesn't have to be in a table, just a list kinda like the internal properties list. Just list them and say which towers apply that damage type! Simple as that (> v o)

IsaacBoi123 (talk) 23:29, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Do you understand how massive of a table that would be, for EACH game that has damage types? Planterror (talk) 23:30, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

oh yea ig BUT I can work hard and do the work, nobody else wants to then I can do it all. AND it would be helpful to other newer players who want to know which towers apply those damage types, because the descriptions of the upgrades don't say them. Like red hot rangs doesnt even have fire damage type, which always confused me when i was starting out.

IsaacBoi123 (talk) 23:35, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

Let me make myself clear. This is not a bad idea because nobody has the willpower to do it. This is a bad idea because it would bloat the page by many times its current length and would be redundant information. A page of that length would only confuse people more when they want to find the other information on the page. Planterror (talk) 23:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)