User talk:Slaith: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 30 January by Polavux in topic Warning
→Warning: Reply |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== Warning == | == Warning == | ||
{{warning|Do not plagiarize content or data from the Fandom wiki.}} | {{warning|Do not plagiarize content or data from the Fandom wiki.|retracted=y}} | ||
Blooncyclopedia's license is incompatible with Fandom's, and vice versa; see [[Blooncyclopedia:Copyrights]]. [[User:Humansongs|Humansongs]] ([[User talk:Humansongs|talk]]) 00:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC) | Blooncyclopedia's license is incompatible with Fandom's, and vice versa; see [[Blooncyclopedia:Copyrights]]. [[User:Humansongs|Humansongs]] ([[User talk:Humansongs|talk]]) 00:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Sorry, I didn't expect that to be a problem. | :Sorry, I didn't expect that to be a problem. | ||
:I am curious, how are we supposed to go about adding the towers' stats in this case? I did get the data from the fandom wiki, but I avoided copy-pasting any text and typed it all myself, so I thought it'd be fine. It'd seem weird to have to re-discover the stats when they're already publicly available, so what should I do? [[User:Slaith|Slaith]] ([[User talk:Slaith|talk]]) 02:03, 30 January 2026 (UTC) | :I am curious, how are we supposed to go about adding the towers' stats in this case? I did get the data from the fandom wiki, but I avoided copy-pasting any text and typed it all myself, so I thought it'd be fine. It'd seem weird to have to re-discover the stats when they're already publicly available, so what should I do? [[User:Slaith|Slaith]] ([[User talk:Slaith|talk]]) 02:03, 30 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
::Ignoring the license, fandom wiki's stats are outdated and shouldn't be used at all. The best place for stats would be https://b2popology.com/ but note that it is only updated to v4.10. [[User:Overclockbtd|Overclockbtd]] ([[User talk:Overclockbtd|talk]]) 02:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC) | |||
::The admin that issued this warning agreed to retract it. You didn't do anything wrong, since you wrote everything in your own words. Someone just assumed that you were plagiarizing, without actually checking what you wrote, based on what you said in your edit summaries. We'll be more careful in the future. But yes, for future reference, [https://b2popology.com/ Battles 2 Popology] is a better source for stats. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 03:02, 30 January 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:02, 30 January 2026
Qualityy Soil and Discounts
[edit source]Where are you getting $2450 from as the expected marketplace price? In both calculations and in game it costs $2520, because $3500 multiplied byy 0.8 for quality soil, then multiplied by 0.9 for a 001 village discount is not $2450. The numbers do line up. Planterror (talk) 21:52, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Discounts in this game stack additively, so with quality soil and the village discount, you'd have a 20%+10% = 30% discount. Looking at the plantation prices shows this. With the quality soil upgrade and a 001 village, that upgrade costs $1925 (2750*0.7), as opposed to $1980 (2750*0.8*0.9). If this same pattern applied to the marketplace, it would cost $2450 (3500*0.7), not $2520. Slaith (talk) 22:05, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, you're correct on this being in the current version of the game, so I will not revert the price edits made to the upgrade pages. However, I do have proof of it working like this on launch, and it seems like they patched out this behavior in 4.4 due to the patch notes stating that there was a bug where the prices would show incorrectly.
- At 35:18 on the following video, a Temple is purchased with support sacrifices, which is a 5% discount, which makes the quality soil appear as $285 for a few frames, before changing to $225. This is in line with discounts being additive, too. I'm going to adjust the update pages accordingly where on launch they are the increased price, then on 4.4 they are then lowered in price to the amount we see today.
Planterror (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
Warning
[edit source]
|
This user received a warning from Blooncyclopedia staff that has been retracted. This message is kept for historical purposes. Do not plagiarize content or data from the Fandom wiki. |
Blooncyclopedia's license is incompatible with Fandom's, and vice versa; see Blooncyclopedia:Copyrights. Humansongs (talk) 00:49, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't expect that to be a problem.
- I am curious, how are we supposed to go about adding the towers' stats in this case? I did get the data from the fandom wiki, but I avoided copy-pasting any text and typed it all myself, so I thought it'd be fine. It'd seem weird to have to re-discover the stats when they're already publicly available, so what should I do? Slaith (talk) 02:03, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- Ignoring the license, fandom wiki's stats are outdated and shouldn't be used at all. The best place for stats would be https://b2popology.com/ but note that it is only updated to v4.10. Overclockbtd (talk) 02:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
- The admin that issued this warning agreed to retract it. You didn't do anything wrong, since you wrote everything in your own words. Someone just assumed that you were plagiarizing, without actually checking what you wrote, based on what you said in your edit summaries. We'll be more careful in the future. But yes, for future reference, Battles 2 Popology is a better source for stats. Polavux (talk) 03:02, 30 January 2026 (UTC)