Forum:Legacy section for reworked topics: Difference between revisions
Overclockbtd (talk | contribs) |
→Comments: Reply |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Now that this proposal has passed, how should this be implemented? Should it be one one page that details all reworked topics? Should it be on each subject's individual page? How should a topic be classified as "legacy"? [[User:Overclockbtd|Overclockbtd]] ([[User talk:Overclockbtd|talk]]) 05:37, 29 April 2026 (UTC) | Now that this proposal has passed, how should this be implemented? Should it be one one page that details all reworked topics? Should it be on each subject's individual page? How should a topic be classified as "legacy"? [[User:Overclockbtd|Overclockbtd]] ([[User talk:Overclockbtd|talk]]) 05:37, 29 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Yeah, the lack of implementation details and criteria for what counts as a rework is why I didn't support this proposal, and I don't want to enact this proposal until those are settled. Personally I think legacy content should be sections of the pages they relate to. Maybe we could add a level 2 section named "history" and make pre-release, update history, and legacy sections into level 3 sub-sections of those, since they all have to do with the subject prior to the current version. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 06:35, 29 April 2026 (UTC) | |||
::Just to clarify, the "history" section would only exist if the subject would have at least two sub-sections of it. Like, if a subject only has update history, the update history header would stay at level 2. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 06:36, 29 April 2026 (UTC) | |||