Forum:Village pump

Line 216:

:*Some number of pages for Bloons Blitz, depending on how long the soft launch lasts

:I don't think this namespace will have more than 30 pages. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 23:08, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

:I feel it is not necessary to have a namespace for development versions of games and they can be on main. A "Development" version in the main article of the subject should be more than enough to cover it and if the section starts to get long, it can be moved its own article as "Development of X" or similar name and link them with the Main Hat. This because the way we would cover it should be similar to other main articles, I am thinking these sections articles could look like the [[Frontier Legends#Pre-release]] section and/or the [[Bloons TD (series)]] article in general. And while talking about each version, we can have a main hat linking to the version's notes on the update history namespace if needed.

:Now on the update history discussion, changes between early versions can be covered as usual in the update history namespace, no problem with that, but I am not a fan of the idea of subjects having a "version 1.0 changes" or changes of the "beta" versions on the history section, I feel these changes should be contained only between those articles. Certainly there is a problem with the differences between the last beta to the full launch. For me a "version 1.0" article can be created in the update history namespace to detail the changes between the last development version an the release version of the game (an maybe also between sequel games and their predecessors in a more broad way as they may not be completely comparable), but these should not appear on the history sections of the main articles, but that's just me.

:Well, these were my five cents. [[User:Drgoku282|Drgoku282]] ([[User talk:Drgoku282|talk]]) 00:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 216: / Line 216: @@
 :*Some number of pages for Bloons Blitz, depending on how long the soft launch lasts
 :I don't think this namespace will have more than 30 pages. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 23:08, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
+:I feel it is not necessary to have a namespace for development versions of games and they can be on main. A "Development" version in the main article of the subject should be more than enough to cover it and if the section starts to get long, it can be moved its own article as "Development of X" or similar name and link them with the Main Hat. This because the way we would cover it should be similar to other main articles, I am thinking these sections articles could look like the  [[Frontier Legends#Pre-release]] section and/or the  [[Bloons TD (series)]] article in general. And while talking about each version, we can have a main hat linking to the version's notes on the update history namespace if needed.
+:Now on the update history discussion, changes between early versions can be covered as usual in the update history namespace, no problem with that, but I am not a fan of the idea of subjects having a "version 1.0 changes" or changes of the "beta" versions on the history section, I feel these changes should be contained only between those articles. Certainly there is a problem with the differences between the last beta to the full launch. For me a "version 1.0" article can be created in the update history namespace to detail the changes between the last development version an the release version of the game (an maybe also between sequel games and their predecessors in a more broad way as they may not be completely comparable), but these should not appear on the history sections of the main articles, but that's just me.
+:Well, these were my five cents. [[User:Drgoku282|Drgoku282]] ([[User talk:Drgoku282|talk]]) 00:13, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Forum:Village pump: Difference between revisions