Blooncyclopedia talk:Copyrights: Difference between revisions

Line 10:

P.S. The CAPTCHA is hard to see due to the background color being so close to the text color. [[User:CarlFilip19|CarlFilip19]] ([[User talk:CarlFilip19|talk]]) 13:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

:Ensuring that every edit that copies content from the fandom wiki is properly disclosed and attributed sounds like a nightmare. Most of the material on the fandom wiki is really poorly structured and written anyway, so I don't see how we're losing out on much by blanket banning that content from being copied over entirely. Using CC-BY-NC-SA hasn't stopped sites like Bulbapedia or the Minecraft Wiki from running ads, and I don't really see any other situations where using a non-commercial licence restricts what we can do.

:Telling me I should start the whole project over from scratch just because you don't like the license is ''wild''. Relicensing isn't impossible. If I wanted to relicense material on Blooncyclopedia for whatever reason, then I could get the consent from the site's contributors to have their material released under a different license. This could be done with a [https://megamanwiki.com/wiki/Mega_Man_Wiki:Re-licensing_of_the_wiki discussion on the wiki where authors explicitly agree to have their material relicensed]. We would have to undo/revert material from anyone who didn't give consent, but that's still much better than deleting everything and starting over. [[User:Polavux|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux|vux]] 15:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 P.S. The CAPTCHA is hard to see due to the background color being so close to the text color. [[User:CarlFilip19|CarlFilip19]] ([[User talk:CarlFilip19|talk]]) 13:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
+:Ensuring that every edit that copies content from the fandom wiki is properly disclosed and attributed sounds like a nightmare. Most of the material on the fandom wiki is really poorly structured and written anyway, so I don't see how we're losing out on much by blanket banning that content from being copied over entirely. Using CC-BY-NC-SA hasn't stopped sites like Bulbapedia or the Minecraft Wiki from running ads, and I don't really see any other situations where using a non-commercial licence restricts what we can do.
+:Telling me I should start the whole project over from scratch just because you don't like the license is ''wild''. Relicensing isn't impossible. If I wanted to relicense material on Blooncyclopedia for whatever reason, then I could get the consent from the site's contributors to have their material released under a different license. This could be done with a [https://megamanwiki.com/wiki/Mega_Man_Wiki:Re-licensing_of_the_wiki discussion on the wiki where authors explicitly agree to have their material relicensed]. We would have to undo/revert material from anyone who didn't give consent, but that's still much better than deleting everything and starting over. [[User:Polavux|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux|vux]] 15:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)