Blooncyclopedia:Writing guidelines: Difference between revisions

Line 8:

*'''Flowery/pedantic prose''': Don't use overly fancy words and exaggeration to describe things that can be summarized more concisely, like describing in-game text containing a single minor swear as a [https://bloons.fandom.com/wiki/Pre-Round_Comment?diff=383210&oldid=383209 "profanity-ridden remark"]. This isn't a work of literary fiction.

*'''Stating the obvious''': If the role of the subject is self-evident from the name, then it doesn't need to be stated. For example, "Dart Monkeys are monkeys who wield darts" is not a good opening sentence.

*'''Second person''': Avoid referring to the reader directly. Use "the player" instead of "you" when describing actions taken by players, and use the name of the subject when describing actions taken by something in the game. For example, "if the player activates Rapid Shot, Quincy will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is good, but "if you activate Rapid Shot, you will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is not. [[Blooncyclopedia:Strategy guidelines|~~strategy~~ articles]] are an exception to this since they're ~~written~~ more ~~casually~~, but they should still ~~be used~~ sparingly.

*'''Second person''': Avoid referring to the reader directly. Use "the player" instead of "you" when describing actions taken by players, and use the name of the subject when describing actions taken by something in the game. For example, "if the player activates Rapid Shot, Quincy will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is good, but "if you activate Rapid Shot, you will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is not. [[Blooncyclopedia:Strategy guidelines|Strategy articles]] are an exception to this since they're more casual, but they should still use the second person sparingly, if at all.

*'''[[wp:Passive voice|Passive voice]]''': Passive voice is describing an action as being applied to the subject, rather than the subject applying an action. "Quincy will destroy the MOAB on round 40" is active voice, while "the MOAB on round 40 will be destroyed by Quincy" is passive voice. These mean the same thing and are both grammatically correct, but the latter conveys it in a more awkward and roundabout way. Passive voice should only be used if the subject of the sentence is unknown.

*'''Editorializing''': Don't criticize something or make it sound bad just because you don't like it. Keep it strictly factual, such as listing a tower's weaknesses to certain Bloons or situations, or giving the pros/cons of a subject in comparison to something.

Line 16:

==When to be flippant==

*Witty remarks should be relevant to the topic, be used sparingly, and be kept out of sections describing technical details or complex game mechanics. Good places for these include image captions (if the image is otherwise self-explanatory) and strategy sections.

*In strategy sections, if the subject is just plain bad and not remotely worth using, being blunt is preferred over matter-of-fact-ly prose. "[[Viral Frost (BTD5)|Viral Frost]] does absolutely nothing to improve on [[Arctic Wind (BTD5)|Arctic Wind]] in any way" and "[[Trade Empire (BTD6)|Trade Empire]] in [[CHIMPS]] is the equivalent of two tier 2 Buccaneers for $34,000" get the point across much better than "Viral Frost is generally considered an unnecessary upgrade to Arctic Wind because it is not much more effective at slowing Bloons" and "Trade Empire is not worth purchasing in CHIMPS because it does not generate cash and the damage and attack speed bonuses are not worth the cost".

*Edits that just add, remove, or change humor and do not add to or improve anything in the article are not constructive and will be reverted, unless the article is clearly overdoing the humor. When in doubt, ask about it on the talk page.

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
 *'''Flowery/pedantic prose''': Don't use overly fancy words and exaggeration to describe things that can be summarized more concisely, like describing in-game text containing a single minor swear as a [https://bloons.fandom.com/wiki/Pre-Round_Comment?diff=383210&oldid=383209 "profanity-ridden remark"]. This isn't a work of literary fiction.
 *'''Stating the obvious''': If the role of the subject is self-evident from the name, then it doesn't need to be stated. For example, "Dart Monkeys are monkeys who wield darts" is not a good opening sentence.
-*'''Second person''': Avoid referring to the reader directly. Use "the player" instead of "you" when describing actions taken by players, and use the name of the subject when describing actions taken by something in the game. For example, "if <u>the player</u> activates Rapid Shot, <u>Quincy</u> will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is good, but "if <u>you</u> activate Rapid Shot, <u>you</u> will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is not. [[Blooncyclopedia:Strategy guidelines|strategy articles]] are an exception to this since they're written more casually, but they should still be used sparingly.
+*'''Second person''': Avoid referring to the reader directly. Use "the player" instead of "you" when describing actions taken by players, and use the name of the subject when describing actions taken by something in the game. For example, "if <u>the player</u> activates Rapid Shot, <u>Quincy</u> will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is good, but "if <u>you</u> activate Rapid Shot, <u>you</u> will destroy the MOAB on round 40 easily" is not. [[Blooncyclopedia:Strategy guidelines|Strategy articles]] are an exception to this since they're more casual, but they should still use the second person sparingly, if at all.
 *'''[[wp:Passive voice|Passive voice]]''': Passive voice is describing an action as being applied to the subject, rather than the subject applying an action. "Quincy will destroy the MOAB on round 40" is active voice, while "the MOAB on round 40 will be destroyed by Quincy" is passive voice. These mean the same thing and are both grammatically correct, but the latter conveys it in a more awkward and roundabout way. Passive voice should only be used if the subject of the sentence is unknown.
 *'''Editorializing''': Don't criticize something or make it sound bad just because you don't like it. Keep it strictly factual, such as listing a tower's weaknesses to certain Bloons or situations, or giving the pros/cons of a subject in comparison to something.
@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 ==When to be flippant==
 *Witty remarks should be relevant to the topic, be used sparingly, and be kept out of sections describing technical details or complex game mechanics. Good places for these include image captions (if the image is otherwise self-explanatory) and strategy sections.
-*In strategy sections, if the subject is just plain bad and not remotely worth using, being blunt is preferred over matter-of-fact-ly prose. "[[Viral Frost (BTD5)|Viral Frost]] does absolutely nothing to improve on [[Arctic Wind (BTD5)|Arctic Wind]] in any way" and "[[Trade Empire (BTD6)|Trade Empire]] in [[CHIMPS]] is the equivalent of two tier 2 Buccaneers for $34,000" get the point across much better than "Viral Frost is generally considered an unnecessary upgrade to Arctic Wind because it is not much more effective at slowing Bloons" and "Trade Empire is not worth purchasing in CHIMPS because it does not generate cash and the damage and attack speed bonuses are not worth the cost".
 *Edits that just add, remove, or change humor and do not add to or improve anything in the article are not constructive and will be reverted, unless the article is clearly overdoing the humor. When in doubt, ask about it on the talk page.