Blooncyclopedia talk:Copyrights: Difference between revisions

Line 14:

:Telling me I should start the whole project over from scratch just because you don't like the license is ''wild''. Relicensing isn't impossible. If I wanted to relicense material on Blooncyclopedia for whatever reason, then I could get the consent from the site's contributors to have their material released under a different license. This could be done with a [https://megamanwiki.com/wiki/Mega_Man_Wiki:Re-licensing_of_the_wiki discussion on the wiki where authors explicitly agree to have their material relicensed]. We would have to undo/revert material from anyone who didn't give consent, but that's still much better than deleting everything and starting over. [[User:Polavux|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux|vux]] 15:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

::I see. This proposed idea does sound cooler. Creative Commons licenses cannot be revoked, but there is the option of putting multiple licenses on work, and future modifications can be put under different licenses if legally possible. I wonder if it will be easier to relicense the wiki early on so that fewer editors will have to be sought for permission to have their contributions relicensed. [[User:CarlFilip19|CarlFilip19]] ([[User talk:CarlFilip19|talk]]) 19:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:41, 29 October 2024 edit Polavux (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 59,587 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 19:53, 29 October 2024 edit undo CarlFilip19 (talk \| contribs) 2 edits Thank you for your quick response.
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:Telling me I should start the whole project over from scratch just because you don't like the license is ''wild''. Relicensing isn't impossible. If I wanted to relicense material on Blooncyclopedia for whatever reason, then I could get the consent from the site's contributors to have their material released under a different license. This could be done with a [https://megamanwiki.com/wiki/Mega_Man_Wiki:Re-licensing_of_the_wiki discussion on the wiki where authors explicitly agree to have their material relicensed]. We would have to undo/revert material from anyone who didn't give consent, but that's still much better than deleting everything and starting over. [[User:Polavux\|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux\|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux\|vux]] 15:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)		:Telling me I should start the whole project over from scratch just because you don't like the license is ''wild''. Relicensing isn't impossible. If I wanted to relicense material on Blooncyclopedia for whatever reason, then I could get the consent from the site's contributors to have their material released under a different license. This could be done with a [https://megamanwiki.com/wiki/Mega_Man_Wiki:Re-licensing_of_the_wiki discussion on the wiki where authors explicitly agree to have their material relicensed]. We would have to undo/revert material from anyone who didn't give consent, but that's still much better than deleting everything and starting over. [[User:Polavux\|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux\|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux\|vux]] 15:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

			::I see. This proposed idea does sound cooler. Creative Commons licenses cannot be revoked, but there is the option of putting multiple licenses on work, and future modifications can be put under different licenses if legally possible. I wonder if it will be easier to relicense the wiki early on so that fewer editors will have to be sought for permission to have their contributions relicensed. [[User:CarlFilip19\|CarlFilip19]] ([[User talk:CarlFilip19\|talk]]) 19:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)