Talk:Tsar Bomba (BTD6): Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 31 August 2025 by Planterror in topic Camo bonus damage
Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) |
Planterror (talk | contribs) →Camo bonus damage: Reply |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
@[[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] please justify this. ---[[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 14:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | @[[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] please justify this. ---[[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 14:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I think we should state the Camo bonus, because even if it's a 2x value it's not like the Camo bonus is fully correlated to base damage, like it's not affected by Alch brews (as neither does brew amplify damage to any other tower that does multiplicative damage bonuses). We do the 2x damage bonuses to stuff like T4+ middle and bottom Desperado, and T3 Deadeye Desperado, so I think it should still make sense for camo damage changes on higher-tier Aces. [[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]]) 14:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | :I think we should state the Camo bonus, because even if it's a 2x value it's not like the Camo bonus is fully correlated to base damage, like it's not affected by Alch brews (as neither does brew amplify damage to any other tower that does multiplicative damage bonuses). We do the 2x damage bonuses to stuff like T4+ middle and bottom Desperado, and T3 Deadeye Desperado, so I think it should still make sense for camo damage changes on higher-tier Aces. [[User:Qwertyxp2000|Qwertyxp2000]] ([[User talk:Qwertyxp2000|talk]]) 14:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
::I reviewed the newer edit, and I still think it could use a wording change. Since the damage is multiplicative of base, shouldn't it say that instead of being +20? I think people are already aware that damage bonuses from other sources like Berserker Brew apply after all damage modifiers, so I don't see why this should be that way. | |||
::This would probably make a good proposal, now that I think about it. [[User:Planterror|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror|talk]]) 16:04, 31 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:04, 31 August 2025
Camo bonus damage
[edit source]Does it matter if we include the bonus camo damage on this page, even if it's a function of the prior upgrades being buffed? it feels redundant to say it has +30 camo damage when that's both not really what's going on and also not directly changed by this upgrade.
@Qwertyxp2000 please justify this. ---Planterror (talk) 14:41, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- I think we should state the Camo bonus, because even if it's a 2x value it's not like the Camo bonus is fully correlated to base damage, like it's not affected by Alch brews (as neither does brew amplify damage to any other tower that does multiplicative damage bonuses). We do the 2x damage bonuses to stuff like T4+ middle and bottom Desperado, and T3 Deadeye Desperado, so I think it should still make sense for camo damage changes on higher-tier Aces. Qwertyxp2000 (talk) 14:51, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- I reviewed the newer edit, and I still think it could use a wording change. Since the damage is multiplicative of base, shouldn't it say that instead of being +20? I think people are already aware that damage bonuses from other sources like Berserker Brew apply after all damage modifiers, so I don't see why this should be that way.
- This would probably make a good proposal, now that I think about it. Planterror (talk) 16:04, 31 August 2025 (UTC)