Talk:Camo detection: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:39, 19 September 2025 edit Planterror (talk \| contribs) Patrollers 4,130 edits →BTD5 generation table should be split.: new section Tag: New topic		Latest revision as of 20:09, 19 September 2025 edit undo Polavux (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators 59,801 edits →BTD5 generation table should be split.: Reply Tag: Reply
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Between the features in BTD5, Battles and BMC, I believe it's correct to split these tables per game instead of per generation. For example, Engineer has sentries at Level 3 MK in BMC see camo, or Battles having the camo detection turbo charge ability, compared to BTD5 where specialty buildings allow ice to decamo. [[User:Planterror\|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror\|talk]]) 16:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)		Between the features in BTD5, Battles and BMC, I believe it's correct to split these tables per game instead of per generation. For example, Engineer has sentries at Level 3 MK in BMC see camo, or Battles having the camo detection turbo charge ability, compared to BTD5 where specialty buildings allow ice to decamo. [[User:Planterror\|Planterror]] ([[User talk:Planterror\|talk]]) 16:39, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

			:I agree. [[Range]] and [[pierce]] do the same thing. [[User:Polavux\|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux\|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux\|vux]] 20:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)