Help talk:Update history: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 9 April by Polavux in topic Crosspath stacking with a change
→Crosspath stacking with a change: new section |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
I think a consensus for these would be useful. [[User:Drgoku282|Drgoku282]] ([[User talk:Drgoku282|talk]]) 04:47, 9 April 2026 (UTC) | I think a consensus for these would be useful. [[User:Drgoku282|Drgoku282]] ([[User talk:Drgoku282|talk]]) 04:47, 9 April 2026 (UTC) | ||
:I prefer the latter. It makes it more clear that the stacking is a consequence of that one upgrade changing, and is not a change made specifically to that crosspath. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 04:52, 9 April 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:52, 9 April 2026
Crosspath stacking with a change
While doing the changes I've been thinking how to handle when a change stacks with a crosspath as it is not in the guidelines, for example btd6 update 54, the xx3 buckshot had its cooldown reduced from 1.5 to 1.2, but this also stacks with the 023 crosspath which goes from 0.99s to 0.792s. In the past I've done two things:
- Do the change in two table rows of the table one for x03 and 013 and a second row for 023 only.
X03;013 Attack cooldown decreased ― 1.5 → 1.2
023 Attack cooldown decreased ― 0.99 → 0.792
- Do the change in a single row, but add the crosspath interaction on the notes.
Attack cooldown decreased ― 1.5 → 1.2
- Note: Stacks with 0-2-X Faster Barrel Spin crosspath ― 0.99s → 0.792s
I think a consensus for these would be useful. Drgoku282 (talk) 04:47, 9 April 2026 (UTC)
- I prefer the latter. It makes it more clear that the stacking is a consequence of that one upgrade changing, and is not a change made specifically to that crosspath. Polavux (talk) 04:52, 9 April 2026 (UTC)