Strategy talk:CHIMPS: Difference between revisions
→"Rounds to watch out for" sucks: new section |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== "Rounds to watch out for" | == "Rounds to watch out for" needs a rework == | ||
This section is too subjective and vague | This section is too subjective and vague. What makes a round worth "watching out for"? There's no distinction between rounds that are almost always a sore spot (63, 78, 98, etc) and rounds that are only a problem in very specific scenarios (82). | ||
Most "notable" rounds aren't notable in just CHIMPS, they're notable in most modes. I think most, if not all, of them could be moved to a strategy article for BTD6 in general, so this article doesn't have to | Most "notable" rounds aren't notable in just CHIMPS, they're notable in most modes. I think most, if not all, of them could be moved to a strategy article for BTD6 in general, so this article doesn't have to be bloated with tips about the game in general and can focus on CHIMPS specifically. | ||
If a section like this is really necessary, then I would structure it more like the round breakdowns in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lILDVZ9_lM&list=PLlSWEYwU0TSeOUdck5cI7nv-ZINZE1E-w&index=3 Chom Chom's guides] (in episodes 3-5). This gives a distinction between rounds that are essentially free, rounds that can be problematic in certain situations, and rounds that are always hard / require specific conditions to be met. [[User:Polavux|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux|vux]] 07:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | If a section like this is really necessary, then I would structure it more like the round breakdowns in [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lILDVZ9_lM&list=PLlSWEYwU0TSeOUdck5cI7nv-ZINZE1E-w&index=3 Chom Chom's guides] (in episodes 3-5). This gives a distinction between rounds that are essentially free, rounds that can be problematic in certain situations, and rounds that are always hard / require specific conditions to be met. [[User:Polavux|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux|vux]] 07:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC) | ||
== What is better for CHIMPS? == | |||
What you think is better for chimps? | |||
[[Icicle Impale (BTD6)|Icicle Impale]]. | |||
[[Super Glue (BTD6)|Super Glue]] | |||
put here your vote [[User:Clarita34566|Clarita34566]] ([[User talk:Clarita34566|talk]]) 01:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Super glue is cheaper, generally better at stalling, doesn't require a bad crosspath or AMD/MIB for DDTs, synergises better with sauda and P&A, and has better stepping stones. [[User:Polavux|po]]●[[User talk:Polavux|la]]●[[Special:Contributions/Polavux|vux]] 01:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:31, 13 October 2024
"Rounds to watch out for" needs a rework
[edit source]This section is too subjective and vague. What makes a round worth "watching out for"? There's no distinction between rounds that are almost always a sore spot (63, 78, 98, etc) and rounds that are only a problem in very specific scenarios (82).
Most "notable" rounds aren't notable in just CHIMPS, they're notable in most modes. I think most, if not all, of them could be moved to a strategy article for BTD6 in general, so this article doesn't have to be bloated with tips about the game in general and can focus on CHIMPS specifically.
If a section like this is really necessary, then I would structure it more like the round breakdowns in Chom Chom's guides (in episodes 3-5). This gives a distinction between rounds that are essentially free, rounds that can be problematic in certain situations, and rounds that are always hard / require specific conditions to be met. po●la●vux 07:11, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
What is better for CHIMPS?
[edit source]What you think is better for chimps?
put here your vote Clarita34566 (talk) 01:08, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
- Super glue is cheaper, generally better at stalling, doesn't require a bad crosspath or AMD/MIB for DDTs, synergises better with sauda and P&A, and has better stepping stones. po●la●vux 01:30, 13 October 2024 (UTC)