Forum:Help desk: Difference between revisions
Hubianzhen (talk | contribs) |
Hubianzhen (talk | contribs) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
:Right now the only unofficial content we cover are certain self-imposed challenges that have some kind of official acknowledgement (e.g., [[NAPS]]). If you want to expand that, I would suggest creating a proposal. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 18:37, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | :Right now the only unofficial content we cover are certain self-imposed challenges that have some kind of official acknowledgement (e.g., [[NAPS]]). If you want to expand that, I would suggest creating a proposal. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 18:37, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
::I would agree with Polavux's reasoning. It can be difficult to differentiate someone who started editing a wiki with a gray area topic from someone who created their account just to cause damage or disruption. Even though this wiki usually documents official content, it may also open up to documenting officially acknowledged community content that is very significant in some way. Some may get their own articles, while some are sufficient enough to be a trivia entry. [[User:Hubianzhen|Hubianzhen]] ([[User talk:Hubianzhen|talk]]) 19:12, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | ::I would agree with Polavux's reasoning. It can be difficult to differentiate someone who started editing a wiki with a gray area topic from someone who created their account just to cause damage or disruption. Even though this wiki usually documents official content, it may also open up to documenting officially acknowledged community content that is very significant in some way. Some may get their own articles, while some are sufficient enough to be a trivia entry. [[User:Hubianzhen|Hubianzhen]] ([[User talk:Hubianzhen|talk]]) 19:12, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::{{blockquote|It can be difficult to differentiate someone who started editing a wiki with a gray area topic from someone who created their account just to cause damage or disruption.}} | |||
:::That's not an excuse for calling someone a troll, though. That's why we have a code of conduct. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 19:16, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::It's a misunderstanding. [[User:Hubianzhen|Hubianzhen]] ([[User talk:Hubianzhen|talk]]) 19:28, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::There was no proper justification, just confusion. We did not know how to handle situations like this effectively. If you believed I made an excuse, you have my permission to issue me a warning. [[User:Hubianzhen|Hubianzhen]] ([[User talk:Hubianzhen|talk]]) 19:45, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
:::::What do you mean "we"? You're not staff. Yes, it was a misunderstanding, but even in that situation there was no reason to assume this person was a troll. [[User:Polavux|Polavux]] ([[User talk:Polavux|talk]]) 20:02, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
::::::The people involved in the situation, not just staff alone. Should've made it clear. [[User:Hubianzhen|Hubianzhen]] ([[User talk:Hubianzhen|talk]]) 20:08, 15 May 2026 (UTC) | |||